Introduction
Many Australians approaching retirement grapple with the significant investment decision of prioritising property or superannuation. Both are common vehicles used to build wealth and generate retirement income, yet they function very differently as investment options. Making an informed choice between these paths is vital for establishing financial security during the retirement phase.
This guide provides a neutral comparison of property investment and superannuation funds for Australian retirees. We will explore crucial considerations including potential returns, tax benefits and implications, access to funds (liquidity), investment risk, and ongoing management demands. Understanding these aspects can help you determine which strategy, or blend of strategies, best suits your individual circumstances and retirement plan.
Comparing Potential Returns and Growth
Income Generation: Rental Income vs. Superannuation Earnings
Investment properties can provide a reliable stream of rental income for retirees. However, it is crucial to calculate the true net yield after accounting for all associated costs. These expenses can include:
- Property management or real estate agent fees
- Council rates and land tax
- Insurance premiums
- Strata levies (if applicable)
- Ongoing maintenance and repair costs
Simply looking at the gross rent received does not provide an accurate picture for comparison. Additionally, deductions like depreciation, while offering tax benefits during the working life, are non-cash items and shouldn’t be included when assessing the actual cash flow generated for retirement income purposes. Therefore, this net rental income figure must be compared realistically against potential earnings within a superannuation fund.
Superannuation fund earnings benefit from a concessional tax environment. During the accumulation phase, investment earnings are typically taxed at 15%, potentially dropping to 10% for capital gains on assets held longer than a year. Furthermore, once a member commences a retirement phase income stream, such as an account-based pension, the investment earnings within that pension account are generally tax-free. This tax advantage can significantly boost the net income received by the retiree.
Capital Growth: Property Appreciation vs. Super Fund Growth
Both property and superannuation offer the potential for capital growth over the long term, although their performance characteristics differ. Historically, Australian residential property, particularly in major cities, has shown strong capital appreciation. However, average growth figures can mask significant variations between different locations, property types, and market cycles.
Superannuation funds, especially those with higher allocations to growth assets like shares, have also demonstrated strong long-term growth. Research comparing average returns over the past decade suggests that median high-growth superannuation funds have generally outperformed average Australian house price growth. For instance, some data indicates average annual returns of around 9.1% for all-growth super funds compared to 6.5% for average capital city house prices over ten years. Another comparison showed cumulative returns over a decade at 157% for median high-growth super versus 84.3% for Australian house values.
It is important to note that:
- Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results for either asset class.
- Premium or “investment-grade” properties in high-demand areas have sometimes achieved capital growth comparable to, or even exceeding, high-growth superannuation funds. For example, certain Sydney regions saw median house value increases of over 130% in a decade.
- Leverage, the ability to borrow to invest, is a key feature of property investment that can significantly magnify capital gains (but also potential losses). This level of gearing is not typically available for standard superannuation contributions.
- Calculating the precise capital growth of a specific property before sale can be challenging, and broad market data may not accurately reflect an individual property’s value changes.
Tax Implications for Retirees
Tax on Investment Earnings and Income
The way investment earnings are taxed differs significantly between property and superannuation, which is an important factor for retirees managing their retirement income.
Net rental income generated from an investment property is typically added to your other income and taxed at your individual marginal tax rate. In contrast, earnings within the superannuation system receive concessional tax treatment. During the accumulation phase (while you are still saving), investment earnings within your super fund are generally taxed at a rate of 15%.
A significant advantage arises in the retirement phase; once you convert your superannuation into a pension account, such as an account-based pension, the investment earnings generated within that account are usually tax-free.
Capital Gains Tax Considerations
When it comes time to sell assets, the Capital Gains Tax (CGT) implications vary. Selling an investment property will likely result in CGT being payable on any profit made. However, if the property has been held for longer than 12 months, investors may be eligible for a 50% CGT discount, effectively halving the taxable gain.
On the other hand, superannuation, particularly in the retirement phase, often presents a more favourable CGT outcome. For individuals aged 60 or over, withdrawals from a superannuation fund—whether as a lump sum or an income stream from a pension account—are typically received tax-free. This means that capital gains realised within the super fund and withdrawn during retirement generally do not attract personal income tax.
Deductions and Concessions
Investment properties offer several potential tax deductions that can offset the rental income received. These commonly include:
- Interest charged on the loan used to purchase the property.
- Council rates and land tax.
- Property management fees and insurance costs.
- Costs associated with maintenance and repairs.
- Depreciation on the building and its fittings (though it’s important to note that depreciation claimed may be recaptured upon sale, potentially increasing the CGT liability).
Conversely, superannuation provides tax advantages primarily through concessional contributions and favourable earnings tax rates. Contributions made into superannuation, such as salary sacrifice or personal deductible contributions, are generally taxed at a concessional rate of 15% (up to certain caps), which is often lower than an individual’s marginal tax rate. This provides an incentive for many Australians to build their retirement savings within the superannuation system.
Speak To An Adelaide Financial Planner Today
Our financial planners are based right here in Adelaide, South Australia.
Key Factors for Retirees to Consider
Liquidity and Access to Funds
A significant difference between superannuation and property investments lies in liquidity, which refers to how quickly you can convert your investment into cash.
Superannuation funds, once conditions of release such as retirement after preservation age are met, can generally be accessed relatively easily and quickly. This allows retirees to draw down income or lump sums as needed.
In contrast, property is considered an illiquid asset. Accessing the capital tied up in an investment property requires selling it, a process that can:
- Take considerable time to complete
- Incur significant transaction costs
- Not allow for partial liquidation (you can’t sell just a room or a window if you only need a small amount of cash)
This lack of easy access to capital is a crucial factor for retirees planning their cash flow.
Risk Profile: Diversification vs. Concentration
Superannuation funds typically offer inherent diversification. Your super balance is usually spread across:
- Various asset classes (like shares, bonds, property, infrastructure)
- Different industries
- Multiple countries
This diversification helps reduce the overall investment risk, as the poor performance of one asset class may be offset by the better performance of another.
Investing directly in property, however, often leads to concentration risk. Unless you have a large portfolio, your investment capital is concentrated in one or a few properties within a specific market. While this can lead to significant gains if that market performs well, it also exposes you fully to any downturns or negative changes affecting that single asset or location.
Your risk tolerance is a key consideration when weighing these different profiles.
Ongoing Management and Costs
Managing an investment property requires active involvement and incurs ongoing expenses. Landlords need to deal with:
- Finding and managing tenants
- Property maintenance and repairs
- Council rates and insurance
- Potentially land tax
While property managers can be hired, this adds another layer of cost and doesn’t eliminate all responsibilities. These hands-on requirements and costs can be particularly burdensome during retirement.
Superannuation, on the other hand, is typically managed professionally by the super fund’s investment managers. Members usually delegate the day-to-day investment decisions and administration. While super funds do charge fees, the management effort required from the individual retiree is generally minimal compared to overseeing an investment property.
Impact on the Age Pension
How your investments are treated by Centrelink can affect your eligibility for the Age Pension. An important distinction exists between your primary residence (the home you live in) and investment properties.
Generally, your family home is exempt from the Age Pension assets test. However, the market value of any investment properties you own is typically assessed under the assets test. Holding significant value in investment properties could therefore reduce or eliminate your entitlement to the Age Pension.
Superannuation assets are also assessed, although the specific rules depend on factors like your age and whether the super is in the accumulation or retirement phase.
The ‘Sell or Not to Sell’ Property for Super Decision
Assessing Net Property Yield vs. Super Potential
When considering selling an investment property to potentially move funds into superannuation, it is crucial to assess the property’s true financial contribution. This involves calculating the net yield, which is the actual income received after all expenses are paid.
Many people focus on the gross rental income, but this doesn’t provide an accurate picture for comparison. To determine the net yield, you must deduct various costs from the gross rent, such as:
- Real estate agent or property management fees
- Strata levies (if applicable)
- Council rates and potential land tax
- Insurance premiums
- Ongoing maintenance and repair costs
It is important to exclude non-cash deductions like depreciation when evaluating the cash flow for retirement income purposes. This final net income figure is the amount that should be realistically compared against the potential earnings achievable within different superannuation investment options, like a balanced or growth fund.
Timing the Sale and Managing Tax
Deciding when to sell an investment property involves significant strategic considerations, particularly concerning tax management and superannuation rules. Property is generally an illiquid asset; unlike superannuation, you cannot easily sell a small portion if you only need access to a limited amount of capital. This illiquidity underscores the importance of planning any sale carefully.
Timing the sale strategically is vital for managing Capital Gains Tax (CGT). If you own multiple investment properties, staggering the sales over several financial years can help minimise the overall tax impact. Selling multiple properties in a single financial year could push you into a higher tax bracket or result in a larger CGT liability than necessary.
Coordinating the property sale with superannuation contribution strategies can maximise tax efficiency. Proceeds from a property sale can potentially be contributed to your super fund through:
- Utilising concessional (deductible) contributions, including any unused carry-forward amounts from previous financial years (back to 2018-19), which can help offset the CGT liability
- Making non-concessional contributions, which also have annual limits ($120,000 from 1 July 2024, with bring-forward rules potentially allowing up to $360,000)
Engaging with your tax accountant is essential to accurately calculate the CGT, considering factors like depreciation recapture, and to plan the timing effectively. Selling just before the end of the financial year requires ensuring settlement occurs with enough time to make planned super contributions.
Careful planning, potentially years in advance of retirement, allows for a strategic disposal of assets to manage tax and effectively transfer wealth into the tax-advantaged superannuation environment.
Conclusion
Choosing between property and superannuation for retirement involves comparing potential returns, tax treatments, liquidity, risk profiles, and ongoing management needs. The decision, including whether to sell property for super, ultimately hinges on your individual circumstances, retirement plan, and risk tolerance.
Making the right investment choice is crucial for a secure retirement income. For personalised guidance tailored to your situation, contact the expert financial advisers at Money Path in Adelaide today to develop a robust retirement plan.
